On June 15, 2022, President Joe Biden released the âExecutive Order on Advancing Equality for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex Individuals.â Ostensibly, this order is issued to protect âLGBTQI+â people from various forms of discrimination. However, there are a number of ways in which this order is sloppily written and potentially harmful.
First, âLGBTQI+â is a bloated acronym, representing disparate demographic groups with unrelatedâand in many cases, conflictingâneeds and demands. Worse, not all these letters even represent defined concepts. For example, what is the proper definition of âtransgenderâ or âqueerâ (or even âgenderâ itself, for that matter)? What does the â+â at the end include? This statement doesnât say.
There are more issues with definitions found in Section 3 of this order, which deals with so-called âconversion therapy.â This section attempts to crack down on âconversion therapyâ by empowering the department of Health and Human Services to re-evaluate the use of federal funds for this practice; it also empowers the The Federal Trade Commission to investigate whether âconversion therapyâ warrants consumer warning labels. However, we are deeply concerned about the definition of âconversion therapyâ offered in this order, namely, âefforts to suppress or change an individualâs sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.â The inclusion of âgender identityâ in this definition is quite troubling because it is such a nebulous, undefinable concept. If âgender identityâ is something different than biological sex, what does it actually mean?
Indeed, the addition of âgender identityâ protection in the conversion therapy definition opens up a whole new can of worms. A crucial part of psychotherapy is to challenge patientsâ internal narratives regarding themselves; hamstringing the ability of therapists to question any sort of âidentityâ is extremely problematic. Another role that therapists can play is encouraging a healthy attitude towards oneâs body. Is it âconversion therapyâ for a counselor to help a gender-dysphoric patient accept his/her biological sex rather than undergoing physical medical transition? The answer could very well be âyes,â especially given the lack of clarity in Bidenâs statement.
To be clear, we have always maintained that any conversion therapy aimed at trying to change someoneâs sexual orientation is immoral and ineffective. We also object to attempts to change someoneâs âgender expression,â insofar as we believe the medical profession has no business reinforcing gender norms and stereotypes, and we firmly believe everyone should be free and encouraged to express themselves outside the constraints of these sexist gender roles. However, for the aforementioned reasons, we believe âgender identityâ needs to be left out of potential conversion therapy restrictions.
We are also alarmed by Section 2a, which empowers the Secretary of Health and Human Services to âprotect LGBTQI+ individualsâ access to medically necessary care from harmful State and local laws and practices.â But what constitutes âmedically necessaryâ care and âharmful State and local laws and practicesâ? We strongly suspect that this passage is a Trojan horse designed to prevent State and local governments from protecting minors from dangerous and potentially permanent surgeries and hormonal therapies. Although it uses the ubiquitous âLGBTQI+â term, it is clearly focused on trans-identifying individuals, of which many are heterosexual, and has nothing to do with lesbian, gay or bisexual LGB people nor with healthcare relating to same-sex orientation.
We would like to emphasize that executive orders are not authorized by any Congressional vote. President Biden could revise or rescind his order as easily as he issued it. We call on the Biden Administration to heed our concerns and reconsider this order.
To read the full text of President Bidenâs âExecutive Order on Advancing Equality for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex Individuals,â click here.